-9.7%
NOC vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+90.2%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -3.8% | +1.2% | -2.5% |
| 7D | -5.2% | -8.0% | +2.8% | -5.2% |
| 30D | -7.2% | -27.9% | +20.7% | -7.2% |
| 3M | -5.1% | -74.6% | +69.5% | -5.7% |
| 6M | -31.1% | -99.5% | +68.4% | -32.6% |
| YTD | -8.6% | -99.7% | +91.2% | -9.7% |
| 1Y | -9.7% | -99.9% | +90.2% | -9.6% |
| All | -9.7% | -99.9% | +90.2% | -9.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling