-7.5%
NOC vs UMAC
+2.9%
-10.4%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -10.9% | +6.3% | -4.1% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -26.0% | +21.1% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +10.3% | -40.3% | +50.7% | +12.7% |
| 3M | -4.3% | -51.1% | +46.8% | -1.6% |
| 6M | -6.5% | -5.6% | -0.9% | -8.4% |
| YTD | -6.7% | +2.3% | -9.0% | -10.8% |
| 1Y | -7.5% | +7.9% | -15.4% | -12.6% |
| All | -7.5% | +2.9% | -10.4% | -12.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling