-47.4%
NKE vs UMC
+209.4%
-256.8%
-47.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +4.6% | -5.5% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +5.0% | -7.0% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -8.6% | +7.7% | -16.3% | -8.4% |
| 3M | -11.0% | +1.7% | -12.7% | -12.0% |
| 6M | -33.2% | +113.9% | -147.2% | -34.8% |
| YTD | -38.1% | +168.9% | -207.0% | -38.5% |
| 1Y | -47.4% | +207.2% | -254.6% | -46.8% |
| All | -47.4% | +209.4% | -256.8% | -46.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling