-37.8%
NFLX vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+62.1%
-46.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | -3.8% | -1.6% | -5.3% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -8.0% | +3.8% | -4.3% |
| 30D | +5.5% | -27.9% | +33.4% | +5.5% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -74.6% | +70.5% | -3.7% |
| 6M | -20.7% | -99.5% | +78.8% | -19.0% |
| YTD | -16.5% | -99.7% | +83.2% | -16.1% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | -99.9% | +62.1% | -40.2% |
| All | -37.8% | -99.9% | +62.1% | -40.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling