-37.8%
NFLX vs RKT
-21.9%
-15.9%
-46.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RKT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | -1.1% | -4.2% | -5.3% |
| 7D | -4.2% | +2.1% | -6.4% | -4.4% |
| 30D | +5.5% | +1.4% | +4.0% | +5.3% |
| 3M | -4.1% | +6.3% | -10.3% | -4.2% |
| 6M | -20.7% | -15.5% | -5.2% | -20.5% |
| YTD | -16.5% | -27.4% | +10.8% | -16.3% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | -26.6% | -11.2% | -38.8% |
| All | -37.8% | -21.9% | -15.9% | -38.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RKT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RKT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RKT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RKT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling