-37.8%
NFLX vs PENG
+118.5%
-156.3%
-46.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | +6.4% | -11.8% | -5.0% |
| 7D | -4.2% | +4.5% | -8.8% | -4.0% |
| 30D | +5.5% | -7.1% | +12.6% | +5.2% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -27.3% | +23.2% | -4.7% |
| 6M | -20.7% | +169.6% | -190.3% | -21.6% |
| YTD | -16.5% | +164.6% | -181.2% | -17.4% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | +109.5% | -147.2% | -39.4% |
| All | -37.8% | +118.5% | -156.3% | -39.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling