-39.3%
NFLX vs MTZ
-14.7%
-24.6%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | -15.4% | +20.1% | +3.2% |
| 7D | +7.1% | -7.4% | +14.5% | +6.3% |
| 30D | -1.6% | -23.6% | +22.0% | -3.8% |
| 3M | -9.8% | -38.3% | +28.6% | -13.3% |
| 6M | -27.1% | -60.6% | +33.5% | -32.0% |
| YTD | -29.2% | -22.9% | -6.3% | -33.2% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | -14.3% | -25.0% | -44.2% |
| All | -39.3% | -14.7% | -24.6% | -44.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling