-39.3%
NFLX vs KMX
+35.0%
-74.2%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KMX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +3.3% | +1.4% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +7.1% | +2.1% | +5.0% | +6.8% |
| 30D | -1.6% | +0.5% | -2.2% | -1.8% |
| 3M | -9.8% | -4.1% | -5.6% | -9.5% |
| 6M | -27.1% | +49.5% | -76.6% | -28.2% |
| YTD | -29.2% | +42.7% | -71.9% | -30.2% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | +35.3% | -74.6% | -40.2% |
| All | -39.3% | +35.0% | -74.2% | -40.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KMX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KMX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KMX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KMX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling