-39.3%
NFLX vs GLDM
+2.8%
-42.0%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +3.7% | +1.0% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +7.1% | -0.3% | +7.4% | +7.0% |
| 30D | -1.6% | -1.9% | +0.2% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -9.8% | -0.4% | -9.4% | -10.0% |
| 6M | -27.1% | -10.1% | -17.0% | -26.8% |
| YTD | -29.2% | -5.8% | -23.3% | -34.1% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | +3.1% | -42.4% | -51.7% |
| All | -39.3% | +2.8% | -42.0% | -51.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling