-39.3%
NFLX vs EWT
+54.0%
-93.2%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EWT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | -1.2% | +5.9% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +7.1% | -10.9% | +18.0% | +5.6% |
| 30D | -1.6% | -17.7% | +16.1% | -3.8% |
| 3M | -9.8% | -5.0% | -4.7% | -10.5% |
| 6M | -27.1% | +7.4% | -34.4% | -27.6% |
| YTD | -29.2% | +52.8% | -82.0% | -28.4% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | +55.2% | -94.4% | -38.5% |
| All | -39.3% | +54.0% | -93.2% | -38.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EWT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EWT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EWT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EWT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling