-39.3%
NFLX vs EOSE
-85.5%
+46.2%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +12.6% | -7.9% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +7.1% | +9.7% | -2.6% | +7.2% |
| 30D | -1.6% | -34.6% | +32.9% | -2.8% |
| 3M | -9.8% | -50.8% | +41.0% | -11.3% |
| 6M | -27.1% | -66.5% | +39.4% | -28.7% |
| YTD | -29.2% | -81.3% | +52.1% | -32.5% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | -84.8% | +45.6% | -41.9% |
| All | -39.3% | -85.5% | +46.2% | -41.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling