-39.3%
NFLX vs AZO
-7.5%
-31.8%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +3.9% | +0.8% | +4.1% |
| 7D | +7.1% | +5.3% | +1.8% | +6.3% |
| 30D | -1.6% | +18.4% | -20.1% | -3.7% |
| 3M | -9.8% | +9.8% | -19.6% | -11.0% |
| 6M | -27.1% | -4.5% | -22.6% | -27.8% |
| YTD | -29.2% | -1.9% | -27.2% | -30.2% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | -9.5% | -29.7% | -39.7% |
| All | -39.3% | -7.5% | -31.8% | -39.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling