-37.8%
NFLX vs ACGL
+4.8%
-42.6%
-46.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | -1.7% | -3.6% | -5.1% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -0.7% | -3.5% | -4.1% |
| 30D | +5.5% | -1.0% | +6.5% | +5.6% |
| 3M | -4.1% | +11.0% | -15.1% | -4.5% |
| 6M | -20.7% | -0.3% | -20.4% | -21.0% |
| YTD | -16.5% | +2.3% | -18.8% | -16.8% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | +6.4% | -44.1% | -38.4% |
| All | -37.8% | +4.8% | -42.6% | -38.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling