+51.1%
NEM vs ZETA
+84.8%
-33.7%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.9% | +2.6% | +7.3% | +9.5% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -5.0% | +8.7% | +4.5% |
| 30D | +2.0% | -3.3% | +5.3% | +2.4% |
| 3M | +21.1% | +31.0% | -9.9% | +15.7% |
| 6M | +9.5% | +72.2% | -62.6% | +0.5% |
| YTD | +19.1% | +56.2% | -37.1% | +11.4% |
| 1Y | +51.1% | +90.3% | -39.2% | +34.7% |
| All | +51.1% | +84.8% | -33.7% | +34.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling