+72.7%
NEM vs LMT
+19.5%
+53.2%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -1.4% | -0.4% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -6.3% | +6.6% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +23.1% | -8.5% | +31.6% | +23.8% |
| 3M | +18.5% | +1.8% | +16.7% | +17.1% |
| 6M | +7.8% | -19.9% | +27.7% | +10.3% |
| YTD | +29.1% | +10.6% | +18.5% | +23.1% |
| 1Y | +72.7% | +17.9% | +54.7% | +67.9% |
| All | +72.7% | +19.5% | +53.2% | +67.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling