+72.7%
NEM vs IEMG
+38.7%
+33.9%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +1.7% | -3.4% | -3.6% |
| 7D | +0.3% | +2.2% | -1.9% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +23.1% | +4.6% | +18.5% | +17.4% |
| 3M | +18.5% | +0.4% | +18.1% | +17.6% |
| 6M | +7.8% | +16.4% | -8.6% | -9.5% |
| YTD | +29.1% | +25.4% | +3.7% | -0.6% |
| 1Y | +72.7% | +38.3% | +34.4% | +26.4% |
| All | +72.7% | +38.7% | +33.9% | +26.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling