+72.7%
NEM vs HL
+134.7%
-62.0%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -2.5% | +0.7% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +0.3% | +1.5% | -1.2% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +23.1% | +25.1% | -2.0% | +9.0% |
| 3M | +18.5% | +22.9% | -4.4% | +5.3% |
| 6M | +7.8% | -4.9% | +12.7% | +7.5% |
| YTD | +29.1% | +7.8% | +21.3% | +19.0% |
| 1Y | +72.7% | +133.9% | -61.2% | +31.6% |
| All | +72.7% | +134.7% | -62.0% | +31.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling