+72.7%
NEM vs GIS
-18.7%
+91.3%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -2.5% | +0.7% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -7.8% | +8.1% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +23.1% | +6.6% | +16.5% | +23.9% |
| 3M | +18.5% | +21.0% | -2.5% | +21.1% |
| 6M | +7.8% | -9.1% | +16.8% | +6.8% |
| YTD | +29.1% | -13.6% | +42.7% | +28.8% |
| 1Y | +72.7% | -18.0% | +90.7% | +69.9% |
| All | +72.7% | -18.7% | +91.3% | +69.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling