+72.7%
NEM vs FLNC
+53.3%
+19.3%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +1.5% | -3.3% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -4.9% | +5.2% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +23.1% | -27.3% | +50.3% | +27.2% |
| 3M | +18.5% | -61.9% | +80.4% | +30.1% |
| 6M | +7.8% | -34.5% | +42.3% | +9.4% |
| YTD | +29.1% | -47.7% | +76.8% | +34.1% |
| 1Y | +72.7% | +53.3% | +19.3% | +57.6% |
| All | +72.7% | +53.3% | +19.3% | +57.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling