+51.1%
NEM vs AZO
-7.5%
+58.6%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.9% | +3.9% | +6.0% | +9.4% |
| 7D | +3.7% | +5.3% | -1.7% | +3.1% |
| 30D | +2.0% | +18.4% | -16.5% | +0.5% |
| 3M | +21.1% | +9.8% | +11.3% | +19.8% |
| 6M | +9.5% | -4.5% | +14.0% | +11.7% |
| YTD | +19.1% | -1.9% | +21.0% | +26.4% |
| 1Y | +51.1% | -9.5% | +60.6% | +54.9% |
| All | +51.1% | -7.5% | +58.6% | +54.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling