+248.8%
NBIS vs IEMG
+38.7%
+210.0%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +1.7% | +5.8% | +4.1% |
| 7D | +8.2% | +2.2% | +6.0% | +3.7% |
| 30D | +3.4% | +4.6% | -1.2% | -4.7% |
| 3M | -12.8% | +0.4% | -13.2% | -11.5% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +16.4% | +115.2% | +81.5% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +25.4% | +145.0% | +76.9% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +38.3% | +210.5% | +145.2% |
| All | +248.8% | +38.7% | +210.0% | +145.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling