+248.8%
NBIS vs ECHO
+40.1%
+208.6%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | 0.0% | +7.5% | +7.5% |
| 7D | +8.2% | +3.4% | +4.8% | +6.0% |
| 30D | +3.4% | +2.4% | +1.0% | +2.9% |
| 3M | -12.8% | -28.0% | +15.1% | +2.2% |
| 6M | +131.5% | -21.2% | +152.8% | +151.6% |
| YTD | +170.5% | -17.4% | +187.8% | +187.3% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +33.6% | +215.2% | +205.3% |
| All | +248.8% | +40.1% | +208.6% | +205.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling