+106.6%
MULL vs INFQ
-39.9%
+146.6%
-68.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | INFQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -13.8% | +1.4% | -15.2% | -14.5% |
| 7D | -35.9% | -11.1% | -24.8% | -31.5% |
| 30D | -47.3% | -32.4% | -15.0% | -35.6% |
| 3M | -30.6% | -25.3% | -5.3% | -19.8% |
| 6M | +13.7% | -30.3% | +44.0% | +29.2% |
| All | +106.6% | -39.9% | +146.6% | +171.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside INFQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus INFQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × INFQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded INFQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling