+265.1%
MU vs ZETA
+84.8%
+180.4%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.0% | +2.6% | -9.6% | -7.2% |
| 7D | -19.1% | -5.0% | -14.1% | -18.8% |
| 30D | -25.2% | -3.3% | -21.9% | -25.0% |
| 3M | -10.9% | +31.0% | -41.9% | -12.8% |
| 6M | +38.0% | +72.2% | -34.2% | +31.7% |
| YTD | +178.8% | +56.2% | +122.7% | +175.0% |
| 1Y | +265.1% | +90.3% | +174.8% | +224.2% |
| All | +265.1% | +84.8% | +180.4% | +224.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling