+719.8%
MU vs IEMG
+38.7%
+681.0%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | +1.7% | +4.4% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +2.2% | +6.7% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +13.8% | +4.6% | +9.2% | +2.7% |
| 3M | +2.1% | +0.4% | +1.7% | +5.9% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +16.4% | +137.5% | +101.5% |
| YTD | +256.4% | +25.4% | +230.9% | +119.2% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | +38.3% | +681.5% | +269.1% |
| All | +719.8% | +38.7% | +681.0% | +269.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling