+265.1%
MU vs GLDM
+2.8%
+262.4%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.0% | +3.7% | -10.7% | -9.7% |
| 7D | -19.1% | -0.3% | -18.8% | -19.0% |
| 30D | -25.2% | -1.9% | -23.4% | -24.2% |
| 3M | -10.9% | -0.4% | -10.5% | -11.0% |
| 6M | +38.0% | -10.1% | +48.1% | +48.4% |
| YTD | +178.8% | -5.8% | +184.7% | +208.0% |
| 1Y | +265.1% | +3.1% | +262.0% | +231.4% |
| All | +265.1% | +2.8% | +262.4% | +231.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling