+265.1%
MU vs FLNC
-69.0%
+334.1%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.0% | +10.2% | -17.2% | -9.9% |
| 7D | -19.1% | -2.1% | -17.0% | -18.9% |
| 30D | -25.2% | -20.8% | -4.5% | -20.6% |
| 3M | -10.9% | -61.3% | +50.4% | +14.9% |
| 6M | +38.0% | -50.9% | +88.8% | +66.5% |
| YTD | +178.8% | -69.4% | +248.2% | +255.5% |
| 1Y | +265.1% | -68.4% | +333.6% | +350.2% |
| All | +265.1% | -69.0% | +334.1% | +350.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling