+265.1%
MU vs BLDR
-38.1%
+303.2%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.0% | +9.3% | -16.3% | -8.1% |
| 7D | -19.1% | +24.4% | -43.5% | -22.2% |
| 30D | -25.2% | +24.9% | -50.2% | -28.3% |
| 3M | -10.9% | -7.8% | -3.1% | -8.1% |
| 6M | +38.0% | -5.8% | +43.8% | +42.3% |
| YTD | +178.8% | -32.5% | +211.3% | +193.4% |
| 1Y | +265.1% | -36.7% | +301.8% | +291.4% |
| All | +265.1% | -38.1% | +303.2% | +291.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling