+265.1%
MU vs BBIO
+26.8%
+238.3%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.0% | +5.2% | -12.2% | -8.2% |
| 7D | -19.1% | +10.0% | -29.1% | -21.2% |
| 30D | -25.2% | +17.8% | -43.0% | -28.5% |
| 3M | -10.9% | -5.1% | -5.8% | -10.1% |
| 6M | +38.0% | +12.9% | +25.1% | +33.1% |
| YTD | +178.8% | +1.8% | +177.0% | +176.8% |
| 1Y | +265.1% | +26.9% | +238.2% | +210.3% |
| All | +265.1% | +26.8% | +238.3% | +210.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling