+265.1%
MU vs ACGL
+28.7%
+236.4%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.0% | +2.7% | -9.7% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -19.1% | +8.0% | -27.1% | -8.2% |
| 30D | -25.2% | +17.3% | -42.5% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -10.9% | +11.2% | -22.1% | +6.6% |
| 6M | +38.0% | +18.2% | +19.8% | +92.4% |
| YTD | +178.8% | +15.4% | +163.4% | +296.8% |
| 1Y | +265.1% | +26.5% | +238.6% | +484.7% |
| All | +265.1% | +28.7% | +236.4% | +484.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling