-14.3%
MTZ vs LPLA
-16.5%
+2.2%
-61.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -15.4% | +4.6% | -20.0% | -15.1% |
| 7D | -7.4% | +15.7% | -23.1% | -6.8% |
| 30D | -23.6% | -6.2% | -17.4% | -23.5% |
| 3M | -38.3% | -12.0% | -26.3% | -38.4% |
| 6M | -60.6% | -2.7% | -57.9% | -60.3% |
| YTD | -22.9% | -12.5% | -10.3% | -22.4% |
| 1Y | -14.3% | -16.5% | +2.3% | -9.2% |
| All | -14.3% | -16.5% | +2.2% | -9.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling