-14.3%
MTZ vs BTSG
+111.7%
-126.0%
-61.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -15.4% | -0.1% | -15.3% | -15.4% |
| 7D | -7.4% | +17.4% | -24.8% | -15.9% |
| 30D | -23.6% | +12.6% | -36.2% | -28.9% |
| 3M | -38.3% | +11.2% | -49.5% | -42.4% |
| 6M | -60.6% | +30.4% | -91.0% | -64.6% |
| YTD | -22.9% | +86.4% | -109.3% | -41.0% |
| 1Y | -14.3% | +117.9% | -132.2% | -38.3% |
| All | -14.3% | +111.7% | -126.0% | -38.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling