+103.9%
MTSI vs NIO
-37.4%
+141.3%
-44.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | -1.6% | +5.0% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -13.0% | +14.4% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +2.1% | -18.3% | +20.4% | +6.4% |
| 3M | -29.7% | -33.2% | +3.5% | -23.6% |
| 6M | +12.5% | -21.5% | +34.0% | +17.3% |
| YTD | +57.0% | -25.5% | +82.5% | +64.3% |
| 1Y | +103.9% | -38.0% | +141.9% | +131.3% |
| All | +103.9% | -37.4% | +141.3% | +131.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling