-99.1%
MSTZ vs PAYC
+29.5%
-128.6%
-99.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09.
| Period | Portfolio | PAYC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.5% | -1.6% | +7.1% | +4.5% |
| 7D | -23.6% | -8.7% | -14.8% | -26.8% |
| 30D | -60.7% | +1.2% | -61.9% | -59.7% |
| 3M | -58.3% | +58.6% | -116.9% | -43.6% |
| 6M | -60.0% | +56.6% | -116.6% | -46.4% |
| YTD | -75.2% | +36.2% | -111.5% | -69.4% |
| 1Y | -19.9% | -2.2% | -17.7% | -23.1% |
| All | -99.1% | +29.5% | -128.6% | -99.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PAYC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PAYC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PAYC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PAYC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling