+9.0%
MSFT vs EAT
+109.8%
-100.9%
-31.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.7% | +6.3% | +0.4% | +6.6% |
| 7D | +4.7% | -0.1% | +4.8% | +4.6% |
| 30D | +5.8% | +13.5% | -7.7% | +5.7% |
| 3M | +13.0% | +1.0% | +12.0% | +12.8% |
| 6M | +34.9% | +57.3% | -22.3% | +34.3% |
| YTD | +15.7% | +53.6% | -37.9% | +14.1% |
| 1Y | +9.0% | +110.8% | -101.9% | +4.6% |
| All | +9.0% | +109.8% | -100.9% | +4.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling