+47.9%
MS vs UMC
+209.4%
-161.5%
-18.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +4.6% | -4.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +5.0% | -3.6% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -0.3% | +7.7% | -7.9% | -1.0% |
| 3M | +0.3% | +1.7% | -1.4% | -0.2% |
| 6M | +31.3% | +113.9% | -82.6% | +25.5% |
| YTD | +24.7% | +168.9% | -144.2% | +16.6% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | +207.2% | -159.3% | +33.2% |
| All | +47.9% | +209.4% | -161.5% | +33.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling