+2,896.9%
MRVL vs NCLH
-38.7%
+2,935.5%
-61.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1990-01-01 to 2026-09-08.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -1.2% | +2.0% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +7.1% | -0.3% | +7.4% | +7.2% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -20.1% | +23.1% | +9.0% |
| 3M | -21.9% | -17.0% | -4.9% | -18.8% |
| 6M | +151.8% | -23.2% | +175.1% | +166.6% |
| YTD | +165.6% | -31.0% | +196.7% | +185.4% |
| 1Y | +242.3% | -37.3% | +279.5% | +273.1% |
| 3Y | +308.2% | -5.6% | +313.7% | +293.9% |
| 5Y | +280.4% | -37.0% | +317.4% | +281.3% |
| 10Y | +1,832.5% | -55.3% | +1,887.8% | +1,725.6% |
| All | +2,896.9% | -38.7% | +2,935.5% | +2,452.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1990-01-01 to 2026-09-08: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1990-01-01 to 2026-09-08 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling