+249.5%
MRVL vs ASML
+134.2%
+115.3%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ASML | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | +4.2% | +2.9% | +3.0% |
| 7D | +3.2% | +1.1% | +2.1% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +5.9% | +2.2% | +3.8% | +3.9% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -2.3% | -27.0% | -25.3% |
| 6M | +186.5% | +23.0% | +163.5% | +163.2% |
| YTD | +163.4% | +61.1% | +102.4% | +102.9% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | +129.1% | +120.4% | +172.2% |
| All | +249.5% | +134.2% | +115.3% | +172.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ASML.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ASML return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ASML return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ASML wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling