+32.5%
MPWR vs NIO
-54.1%
+86.6%
-32.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | +3.4% | -8.5% | -6.0% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -0.6% | +4.7% | +4.2% |
| 30D | -14.8% | -3.5% | -11.3% | -14.0% |
| 3M | -5.4% | -30.7% | +25.3% | +3.4% |
| 6M | -19.6% | -45.6% | +26.0% | -7.1% |
| YTD | +39.8% | -35.3% | +75.1% | +53.1% |
| 1Y | +32.5% | -53.9% | +86.4% | +59.6% |
| All | +32.5% | -54.1% | +86.6% | +59.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling