+117.2%
MPC vs NIO
-54.1%
+171.3%
-19.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.1% | +3.4% | -11.6% | -7.9% |
| 7D | -10.9% | -0.6% | -10.3% | -10.9% |
| 30D | -9.4% | -3.5% | -5.9% | -9.4% |
| 3M | +26.0% | -30.7% | +56.6% | +25.2% |
| 6M | +56.5% | -45.6% | +102.1% | +54.8% |
| YTD | +144.3% | -35.3% | +179.6% | +140.6% |
| 1Y | +117.2% | -53.9% | +171.1% | +138.5% |
| All | +117.2% | -54.1% | +171.3% | +138.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling