-54.7%
MNDY vs EPAM
-76.8%
+22.1%
-86.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.1% | -0.5% | -2.5% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -14.1% | -2.2% | -12.0% | -13.1% |
| 30D | -8.5% | +17.8% | -26.3% | -14.9% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +19.9% | -22.4% | -10.9% |
| 6M | +0.1% | -21.6% | +21.7% | +10.6% |
| YTD | -45.0% | -44.0% | -1.0% | -30.7% |
| 1Y | -58.1% | -30.5% | -27.6% | -52.4% |
| 3Y | -52.6% | -56.8% | +4.2% | -37.2% |
| 5Y | -79.3% | -81.7% | +2.4% | -55.6% |
| All | -54.7% | -76.8% | +22.1% | +5.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling