+19.9%
MDT vs FLNC
-69.0%
+88.9%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | +10.2% | -4.0% | +6.4% |
| 7D | +10.7% | -2.1% | +12.8% | +10.7% |
| 30D | +19.3% | -20.8% | +40.1% | +18.6% |
| 3M | +22.8% | -61.3% | +84.1% | +19.9% |
| 6M | +36.4% | -50.9% | +87.2% | +33.2% |
| YTD | +12.1% | -69.4% | +81.4% | +8.9% |
| 1Y | +19.9% | -68.4% | +88.3% | +16.7% |
| All | +19.9% | -69.0% | +88.9% | +16.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling