+24.4%
MDLZ vs ZETA
+84.8%
-60.3%
-13.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | +2.6% | +0.9% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +8.9% | -5.0% | +13.9% | +8.7% |
| 30D | +15.2% | -3.3% | +18.5% | +15.1% |
| 3M | +9.5% | +31.0% | -21.5% | +10.5% |
| 6M | +11.7% | +72.2% | -60.5% | +13.8% |
| YTD | +28.4% | +56.2% | -27.7% | +31.2% |
| 1Y | +24.4% | +90.3% | -65.9% | +25.8% |
| All | +24.4% | +84.8% | -60.3% | +25.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling