+27.6%
MCK vs ZETA
+84.8%
-57.2%
-27.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | +2.6% | +4.4% | +7.0% |
| 7D | +11.3% | -5.0% | +16.3% | +11.3% |
| 30D | +16.8% | -3.3% | +20.2% | +16.8% |
| 3M | +28.9% | +31.0% | -2.1% | +29.2% |
| 6M | +32.7% | +72.2% | -39.5% | +33.6% |
| YTD | +30.8% | +56.2% | -25.4% | +31.4% |
| 1Y | +27.6% | +90.3% | -62.7% | +28.1% |
| All | +27.6% | +84.8% | -57.2% | +28.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling