+27.6%
MCK vs LDOS
-27.6%
+55.2%
-27.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | +0.7% | +6.3% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +11.3% | -2.8% | +14.1% | +11.5% |
| 30D | +16.8% | +13.6% | +3.2% | +15.6% |
| 3M | +28.9% | +4.2% | +24.7% | +28.0% |
| 6M | +32.7% | -8.2% | +40.9% | +31.1% |
| YTD | +30.8% | -24.1% | +54.9% | +26.6% |
| 1Y | +27.6% | -31.2% | +58.8% | +27.8% |
| All | +27.6% | -27.6% | +55.2% | +27.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling