+29.9%
MCHP vs FLNC
-69.0%
+98.9%
-31.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | +10.2% | -13.5% | -4.4% |
| 7D | -5.4% | -2.1% | -3.3% | -5.3% |
| 30D | -7.5% | -20.8% | +13.2% | -5.4% |
| 3M | -6.0% | -61.3% | +55.3% | +3.1% |
| 6M | -20.1% | -50.9% | +30.8% | -13.6% |
| YTD | +20.2% | -69.4% | +89.6% | +31.4% |
| 1Y | +29.9% | -68.4% | +98.3% | +41.6% |
| All | +29.9% | -69.0% | +98.9% | +41.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling