+50.6%
LYB vs NIO
-54.1%
+104.7%
-35.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.7% | +3.4% | -8.2% | -4.5% |
| 7D | -6.2% | -0.6% | -5.6% | -6.2% |
| 30D | +6.3% | -3.5% | +9.8% | +6.1% |
| 3M | +4.1% | -30.7% | +34.8% | +2.1% |
| 6M | -15.5% | -45.6% | +30.2% | -18.2% |
| YTD | +50.2% | -35.3% | +85.5% | +49.1% |
| 1Y | +50.6% | -53.9% | +104.5% | +64.9% |
| All | +50.6% | -54.1% | +104.7% | +64.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling