-51.2%
LULU vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+48.7%
-53.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.4% | -3.8% | -13.6% | -17.4% |
| 7D | -16.7% | -8.0% | -8.7% | -16.7% |
| 30D | -18.5% | -27.9% | +9.4% | -18.6% |
| 3M | -19.5% | -74.6% | +55.1% | -17.2% |
| 6M | -41.9% | -99.5% | +57.5% | -36.0% |
| YTD | -51.6% | -99.7% | +48.2% | -44.3% |
| 1Y | -51.2% | -99.9% | +48.7% | -41.5% |
| All | -51.2% | -99.9% | +48.7% | -41.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling