-51.2%
LULU vs BBIO
+44.0%
-95.2%
-53.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.4% | -0.8% | -16.6% | -17.3% |
| 7D | -16.7% | -2.3% | -14.4% | -16.5% |
| 30D | -18.5% | -8.7% | -9.8% | -17.7% |
| 3M | -19.5% | +11.2% | -30.6% | -20.8% |
| 6M | -41.9% | +12.5% | -54.4% | -42.5% |
| YTD | -51.6% | -2.2% | -49.4% | -51.8% |
| 1Y | -51.2% | +44.4% | -95.6% | -52.3% |
| All | -51.2% | +44.0% | -95.2% | -52.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling