+69.6%
LSCC vs TRGP
+89.5%
-19.9%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -4.5% | +5.8% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -6.5% | +9.4% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -19.3% | -0.4% | -18.8% | -19.3% |
| 3M | -22.3% | +8.8% | -31.1% | -21.7% |
| 6M | -14.6% | +11.0% | -25.6% | -13.8% |
| YTD | +45.8% | +57.4% | -11.6% | +41.5% |
| 1Y | +69.6% | +87.9% | -18.2% | +68.7% |
| All | +69.6% | +89.5% | -19.9% | +68.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling